
Its front page has an image of a man whose eyes are covered with a black bar which features the word "censored".
t comes after Twitter users reacted to a footballer's attempt to find out who is putting information about him on the website by posting new messages online.
The player, who an injunction says can only be identified as CTB, is involved in proceedings against former Miss Wales and ex-Big Brother star Imogen Thomas and the Sun ne

In recent weeks there has been heightened scrutiny of gagging orders such as injunctions and so-called super-injunctions - court orders that prevent the media from revealing even the fact that an injunction has been granted.
In its editorial explaining the move, the Sunday Herald said it named the sportsman being linked to the injunction on Twitter because it was "unsustainable" for newspapers to be prevented from sharing information which is easily available on the internet.
It said: "We should point out immediately that we are not accusing the footballer concerned of any misdeed. Whether the allegations against him are true or not has no relevance to this debate.
The issue is one of freedom of information and of a growing argument in favour of more restrictive privacy laws."
Richard Walker, editor of the Sunday Herald, said: "It seems to us a ludicrous situation where we are supposed to keep from our readers the identity of someone who anybody can find out on the internet at the click of a mouse, and in fact many people have already done so."
He added that he had taken extensive legal advice and was not expecting any legal consequences because the injunction was not valid in Scotland - only in England.
His paper, he said, was not published, distributed or sold in England.
The newspaper's website is not carrying the name of the footballer or the picture used on the front page of its printed newspaper.
Paul McBride, the paper's legal adviser, said: "Every child in the country with a mobile phone can now access Twitter or the internet and find out who this individual is, and the idea that the media cannot report it is frankly absurd."
Asked whether the front page would increase newspaper sales, he said the decision to publish was "not taken on commercial grounds but on grounds of principle".
"We have the right of freedom of expression and the right to debate these issues. I think the publication in today's paper will bring the matter to a head."
Related Post:
word top news
- Ofcom probes John Darwin email hacking by Sky News
- David Cameron has welcomed EU backing for UK
- Bhoja Airline tragic incident killing all 127 people
- indonesia earthquake april 11 2012, Potential tsunami
- philippine armed forces modernization 2012
- 7 killed in US shootout; Indian-American girl among injured
- forecast flooding from Queensland moves downstream into NSW next week
- where get best girls in bali
- best place wine beer in bali indonesia
- Hajj exhibition at the British Museum open jan 26 2012
- Obama raises pressure for Syria regime change
- foreign tourists victims in Ethiopia attacks
- How to use Polar Ft1 Heart Rate Monitor As A Stopwatch
- chase auto finance grace period
- Powered by Article Dashboard buy foreign currency
- published news upcoming news submit a new story groups graphics card
- will tsunami potential japan earthquake january 1 2012
- mayan calendar world on December 21 2012
- japan earthquake Dec 31 2011
- japan earthquake 6.8-magnitude january 1 2012
- Mayan calendar, what will happen on december 22 2012
- why cesaria evora death
- BISE Multan Board 10th Class Date Sheet 2012
- when shahbaz sharif give laptop which date
- bise lahore matric supplementary result december 2011